The United Methodist Judicial Council will consider items deferred from its October meeting during a special session just prior the 2019 General Conference in St. Louis. Submissions for the top court’s special session are limited to bodies authorized to file petitions by The United Methodist Book of Discipline.
Council to meet before special GC2019 to act on petitions.
The United Methodist Judicial Council will consider five petitions deferred from its fall meeting during a Feb. 19-26 special session in St. Louis.
Your support of The General Administration Fund apportionment supports the legislative body of the denomination, the Judicial Council.
The session will begin just prior to the special General Conference, which meets Feb. 23-26 at the America’s Center Convention Complex in St. Louis to consider possible plans to resolve the decades-old conflict over homosexuality. Judicial Council will continue to meet during General Conference, as needed, when it receives requests from that body to consider.
Submissions for the top court’s special session are only for requests for action “that must be considered prior to the beginning of the called session of the General Conference,” the Rev. Lui Tran, Judicial Council secretary, said in a statement. Requests are limited to bodies authorized to file petitions by Paragraphs 2609 and 2610 in The United Methodist Book of Discipline, Tran said.
Nov. 30 was the submission deadline for February’s special session and a tentative docket will be released sometime later.
Any amended opening briefs from those who previously submitted such briefs for the five docket items was due Dec. 14. Requests for an oral hearing were also due by Dec. 14. Amended original reply briefs’ deadline was Dec. 24. Any new submissions related to the docket items must be approved by the Judicial Council president.
Docket items deferred by the council in October include:
- A review of a decision of law by Baltimore-Washington Bishop LaTrelle Easterling.
- A request by the Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters about mistakes made during General Conference 2016 regarding the retirement of central conference bishops.
- A review of a decision of law by North Texas Bishop Michael McKee that a question on a tabled resolution.
- Reviews of two separate decisions of law by Greater New Jersey Bishop John Schol. The first is about participation in a lawsuit filed against the New Jersey State Board of Education and Acting Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education. The second is about the scheduling of “church superconferences” at locations other than the involved local churches.
Linda Bloom, assistant news editor, UMNS
One of seven apportioned giving opportunities of The United Methodist Church, the General Administration Fund implements trustworthy administrative oversight, supports the legislative processes of the church and curates The United Methodist Church’s rich history. Please encourage your leaders and congregations to support the General Administration Fund apportionment at 100 percent.